Vincent,
It’s good that you have posted this issue for debate. As concerned Malaysians, we should be allowed to have a say in policies and plans that would shape our future.
Following Mr Ng’s comments in the Star, I replied in another Letter to the Editor which was however not published. Sad to say, at that time the Shah Alam floods took precedence.
I post herewith extract of that letter which I feel is not only a suitable reply to Mr Ng’s article but for the more recent comments by the Fisheries Department.
quote:
Persatuan Memancing Malaysia or the Malaysian Angling Association does not dispute the fact that the Tilapia is an excellent and cheap protein source. What we are advocating is the responsible farming of these non-indigenous species.
As your guest columnist, Mr Anthony Geoffrey pointed out in the Sunday Star, fish farming should be confined to totally enclosed waters. The cages used for fish farming can and is usually damaged, thus releasing the alien species to reproduce and colonise our waters.
In their competition for food and continual survival of its species, the Tilapia would prey on the local species. Even if the tilapia of the genus Oreochromis is not aggressive as claimed by Mr Ng, the following scenario is what happens in Nature.
The Tilapia attacks and devour fish fries of the local species; decimating their population. What would be left are the adult or juvenile local species which would eventually die.
Where is the next generation of these species if they have already fallen prey to the non-indegenous species in their infant stage?
In the meantime, the Tilapia is producing generations upon generations of its own kind. Being Cichlids, they reproduce at tremendous speed and quantity with low mortality rate.
What would be left is the Tilapia at the top of the food chain. Final result; extinction of the local species!
As Mr Anthony Geoffrey stated in his column;”The only thing to do now is to attempt to minimize their effect on indigenous species by introducing more restrictive breeding in continous waterways and by boosting the numbers of local species through breeding and introduction programmes.”
Our indigenous fish species are already under threat from pollution, over fishing, development, etc. Do we need to put more pressure on their existence?
Would we eventually have to introduce a local species to our children through pictures in reference books?
WE have the power to take charge of the future to ensure the continual existence of our biological assets. Let not our indigenous species fall into the same category of the now extinct Tasmanian Tiger or Dodo bird.
Let us learn from those mistakes and not repeat them while we still have a chance.</font id=“red”>
quote:
As I have mentioned earlier, PeMM does not dispute the fact that the Tilapia is a good source of cheap nutrition. We see both the nutritional and economical point of view.
And we accept the fact that the Tilapia fish has been in Malaysia for the past half a century. Irradication of this species is impossible and not viable.
What we are asking for is that the aquaculture of such alien species be done responsibly and ethically.
[/img]
RainbowRunner
Tightlines and screaming reels