Rahsia..he.he..aku nak pi perak.Mungkin Air Ganda Kot?nak follow ke?
pegi dulu laa… heheheheh dapat ikan kasi sikit laa…
Ish mana boleh…kan ini topik Catch & Release..he..he..
opss… lupa lakss… hehehehehe… kasi gamba la taruk kat sini..
Kalau dapat la..
aii belom pegi dah patah semangat… Hehehehehehe… tu yang ikan malaih nak makan umpan tuh…
Rendah diri la…
Bagus bagus… Rendah diri… hehehehe
Aku satu soalan untuk korang semua.
Adakah ikan induk dan telurnya itu selamat selepas kita release?
kalau umurnya panjang..insya allah akan selamat lah ia…
quote:kau baca posting fishnut75 kt english section..leave him mama alone.
Originally posted by Lefty
Aku satu soalan untuk korang semua.Adakah ikan induk dan telurnya itu selamat selepas kita release?
alah..kau bacakan la…he..he..
quote:
Originally posted by Lefty
Aku satu soalan untuk korang semua.Adakah ikan induk dan telurnya itu selamat selepas kita release?
Tumbesaran anak nye nanti terbantut kot… [:D][:D][:D]…
Tekejut kene ‘strike’ [8D]
quote:
Originally posted by KoYaBeH
WeI sHIdaN nkO taK nah poN lepaS ikaN yG keciK2. Ari Tu kaT keloNg maMOOd daPaT anaK keraPu BesO tangaN poN nkO rembaT hahahahahahaha...syok nyeeeeee naariKKK
aler… mase nih baru lajar mancing la kawan… baru dok tengah kemaruk dapat ikan…
quote:
Originally posted by KoYaBeH
hehehe masa mula-mula dulu ako pon gitu jugok heheheheh apa je sangkut aku sapu hehehesyok nyeeeeee naariKKK
ye la nko mane tak nye.. kalu balik tak bawak ikan … bini nko ngamok!!! aku tau laa… hehehehehe [:D][:D][:p]
quote:
Originally posted by KoYaBeH
mana ada gu kawey royak la kawe lepas sumer ikan tu,...kan tangkap dan lepas..hehehehehsyok nyeeeeee naariKKK
NuN sutong panggil tu… hahahahahaha
Boleh ape pakai konsep C & R …
ye la nko takut nak lepas laa… sebab nanti nko nak bagi aku kan…
Maaf mencelah,
Ni saya ada dapat infor, so tak payah lah nak bahas banyak2 [:D]
Info nie dalam English, ia menerangkan pro & contra tentang CNR nie.
Quote:
National Symposium - Managing Marine Recreational Fisheries in the 21st Century
San Diego, CA
For Information Contact:
Jon A. Lucy, Virginia Sea Grant Marine Advisory Program, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, P.O. Box 1376, Gloucester Pt., VA 23062; Phone: 804-684-7166, Email: lucy@vims.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catch and release has a long history of producing quantified benefits for freshwater fisheries and the anglers enjoying those fisheries. As a result the practice is an integral part of freshwater fisheries management. In contrast, trying to define benefits to anglers practicing catch and release in open estuarine and ocean waters is more complex, since neither the fish nor the angling effort have the conventional boundaries associated with freshwater fisheries.
More importantly, marine fish stocks are shared between commercial and recreational fisheries. Conflicts between the competing fisheries further complicate documenting benefits accruing to fish and anglers from catch and release fishing practices Given current and historical catch estimates for U.S. commercial and recreational fisheries, it is likely that for most species targeted by both fisheries, commercial fishing exerts far greater impacts on stocks than recreational fishing. Further complicating the picture is the fact that many marine anglers feel that commercial fisheries’ bycatch largely negates benefits potentially gained by anglers practicing catch and release. These issues add to the difficulty of reaching a consensus among marine recreational fishery leaders regarding significant benefits accruing to specific fish stocks from anglers’ catch and release practices.
Given the complexities of the previously mentioned issues and their largely undefined impacts on marine anglers’ conservation-oriented fishing behavior, it is not surprising that fishery researchers and managers have yet to get much of a handle on defining and quantifying the modes of catch and release fishing practiced by anglers as well as what proportions of marine anglers consistently practice any of the variations of catch and release. These issues were addressed at the National Symposium on Catch and Release in Marine Recreational Fisheries (December 1999, Virginia Beach, VA). Not unlike freshwater fisheries, catch and release in marine fisheries means different things to different anglers. However, it is likely there is at least more inconsistency in such practices among marine anglers, if for no other reason the concerns recreational anglers have regarding whether in certain fisheries their catch and release efforts are often being compromised by current commercial fishing practices.
Aside from this issue, whether an angler practices catch and release, and how conscientiously it is practiced, are influenced by the angler’s culture, financial stability, education level, long-term fishing history, association with fishing clubs or conservation groups, targeted species, the fishing experience on the specific day in question, and whether releasing fish is voluntary or regulated. There is much work yet to do in marine recreational fisheries linking such variables to how anglers practice what appears to many to be a growing trend in stronger angling ethics, a significant part of which is practicing catch and release fishing.
CATCH AND RELEASE BENEFITS–THE FISH
Tagging program results, including those in which anglers assist research and management programs with tagging fish, are one of the strongest sources of evidence that anglers’ catch and release efforts benefit fish and fish stocks. There are numerous examples of new or improved information on specific species’ migratory patterns, rates of movement, spawning areas, and growth rates incorporated into technical reports, peer review publications and fishery management plans as a result of anglers helping tag and release fish. Without this documentation, discussion of catch and release benefits to marine fish would be largely theoretical.
In addition to the scientific and management benefits of such anglers’ efforts, tagging programs have proven to motivate significant numbers of anglers to not only tag fish, but more importantly to be more observant regarding handling fish they catch. Tagging programs managed by agency scientists, as well as those managed by non-government organizations, i.e., the American Littoral Society, also share the honor of leading thousands of marine anglers in different countries to incorporate catch and release into their fishing activities.
The rebounding of the Atlantic coast striped bass fishery is one of the best examples of benefits resulting from anglers’ catch and release practices. Tag return data of the American Littoral Society, produced as the result of anglers catch and release fishing efforts, assisted researchers and fishery managers in making the case for passage by Congress of the 1984 Emergency Striped Bass Act. The Act enabled uniform, coastwise management of the fishery that ultimately brought the stock out of its precipitous decline. During periods of striped bass fishing moratoriums about a decade ago, and later when the fishery reopened under stringent size and bag limits, anglers witnessed the stock rebuilding as catch and release became an increasingly important element of the recreational and charter boat fishery. This experience converted many Atlantic coast anglers into believers regarding benefits of catch and release.
Catch and release fishing is not without negative impacts on fish populations. Not all fish survive after being released. Therefore catch and release, like other fishery conservation and management actions, needs to be assessed as to what it can, and cannot, accomplish. As an example, through hook-release mortality studies on striped bass in Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay the fishing variables contributing to the mortality of released fish are being documented so that anglers and fishery managers can work together to minimize such impacts. Especially when striped bass are caught in areas of low salinity, coupled with high water temperatures, post-release survival rates can be markedly reduced.
Similarly, use of J-shaped hooks in the chumming fishery has proven to produce relatively high levels of gut-hooking and thereby mortalities in released fish. Reducing fishing pressure in areas during periods of high temperature and studies showing that circle hooks markedly reducing rates of deep hooking in the striped bass chumming fishery are helping anglers and charter captains hold down post-release mortality in the striped bass fishery. This is particularly important since NMFS MRFSS survey estimates indicate that in 1994 93% of all Atlantic striped bass caught were released. Interestingly for advocates of catch and release, of those fish release in 1994, 4% were released even though they legally could have been kept by the angler. High release rates, attributed largely to regulations, have been the rule for the past decade. Since 1991, MRFSS surveys indicate over 91% of the striped bass caught by anglers along the Atlantic coast have been released alive.
As previously noted for striped bass, a growing body of hook-release mortality research is documenting that catch and release can produce high levels of post-release survival of fish, thereby benefiting the rebuilding and sustaining of fish populations supporting recreational fisheries. As an example, estimated post-release survival rates various species are as follows:
Atlantic coast striped bass: 85-90% post-release survival (PRS), likely higher when using circle hooks (MA and MD studies)
Summer flounder: 85-90% PRS (coordinated studies in NY, VA, and NC comparing J-hooks and circle hooks did not demonstrate that for this one species circle hooks do not appear to significantly improve post-release survival rates)
Weakfish (gray trout): 98% PRS (VA and NY studies)
Tautog (blackfish): 98% PRS (VA and CT studies)
Red Drum: 85-98% PRS (SC, GA and TX studies)
Speckled Trout (spotted seatrout): 85-91% PRS (SC and TX studies)
Black Sea Bass: 60-90% PRS (fish taken out of deeper water have lower survival rates; deflating expanded swim bladders may enhance release survival but results are mixed)
Bluefin Tuna: large school to medium fish-80% or better PRS (VA study, 48 hr. telemetry tracks of 5 fish; 1 additional tagged fish died from hook injury to gills); giant bluefin tuna-90% or better PRS or higher (NC and MA studies)
Blue Marlin: at least 89% or better PRS (5 day pop-up satellite tag study of 9 fish off Bermuda) In operation for less that six years, the Virginia Game Fish Tagging Program, which trains anglers to tag nine species, is documenting additional benefits of catch and release fishing for specific fisheries. Some results follow:
Multiple recaptures of large cobia over periods ranging from 1-5 years document that releasing spawning size fish enables these fish to contribute annually to spawning activity known to occur in lower Chesapeake Bay. Some of the recaptured cobia had been gut-hooked and the leader cut when the fish were released. Their recapture a year or more later upon their return to Chesapeake Bay also demonstrated that the species can survive gut-hooking if handled and released properly.
Tagged and released black sea bass, tautog, and red drum have demonstrated that these fish tolerate being caught multiple times over periods ranging from a few days to several months. This documents that catch and release of these species benefits the fishery by allowing released fish to contribute to sustaining the fish population as well as to enhance anglers catch rates. Black drum, red drum, black sea bass, speckled trout, spadefish, and cobia have all been documented through tag returns to survive catch and relese for periods of months to one to two years. In the case of speckled trout and cobia, tagged fish have been shown to survive four and five years, respectively, following release. Similar data on many other hook-and-line caught tagged-released fish exist from tagging programs around the world.
Telemetry tagging of large pelagic species such as billfish and bluefin tuna are documenting that when caught using circle hooks, these species exhibit high post-release survival rates. Evidence that circle hooks significantly reduce hook damage in comparison to J-shaped hooks is rapidly accumulating through studies of trolling and chunking fisheries. Dr. Eric Prince (NMFS, Miami, FL) reported at the December 1999 Catch and Release Symposium that for sailfish, not only did circle hooks produce less hook damage by producing lip/jaw hooked fish, but catch rates were similar for both hook types. Use of circle hooks in Maryland studies of the chumming fishery for striped bass has recently been shown to dramatically reduce the rate of gut-hooking in the fishery, and in the few instances when baited circle hooks were swallowed by fish, release mortality rates were lower in such fish compared to fish gut-hooked with J-shaped hooks. This is the type of hard data which anglers need access to through media and marine extension sources to make intelligent decisions on basic changes in their fishing practices.
CATCH AND RELEASE PAYOFFS FOR ANGLERS
Becoming better educated and motivated to do more catch and release fishing, anglers will ultimately benefit more from the practice. In certain states such as Virginia, greater recognition of catch and release accomplishments is being given anglers where there are13 of 32 species included in the Virginia Saltwater Fishing Tournament awards program, anglers can receive handsome citation plaques for either releasing a fish or the angler has options for both kill or release award. The tournament recently initiated a Chesapeake Bay Grand Slam Release Citation award for any angler releasing in the same 24 hour period a 44-inch minimum red drum, black drum and cobia.
As previously indicated, Atlantic coast angler’s most tangible and significant benefits from increasing practice of catch and release fishing is restoration of a quality striped bass recreational fishery in which not only are catch rates of small to medium size fish good but trophy fish catches are occurring more frequently. Similarly, anglers increasing acceptance of circle hooks, encouraged by the tackle industry offering a growing range of circle hook sizes and wire weights, should ultimately make significant contributions to stocks of inshore species as well as tuna and billfish, given the growing trend in use circle hooks by well-respected anglers, charter captains, and billfish tournaments.
Finally, there are some concerns in the marine angling community that there could potentially be some negatives issues associated with catch and release fishing. A scenario of concern is that successful practice of catch and release results in reduced fishing pressure, and thereby reduced recreational landings of a given species. Then, for whatever reason, fishery managers reevaluate existing quota allocations between the recreational and commercial fisheries. With recreational landings now reduced, as a result of good faith conservation efforts of anglers, if it were decided that the re-allocation of quotas was to be based upon current landings ratios rather than a longer term historical ratio of catches, this would unfairly penalize the recreational fishery. Another area of concern heard in the recreational fishing community is that greater focus on promoting catch and release fishing has the potential to negatively impact the head/party boat fishery, and possibly some components of the charter boat fishery where anglers paying to fish are strongly motivated to keep fish for personal and family consumption. Certain elements of the marine angling community are not yet as accepting of paying to largely catch and release fish as their counterparts in freshwater fisheries.
These issues and concerns can only be adequately addressed if we earnestly work on the priority action agenda items developed at the Catch and Release Symposium: (1) conduct additional and more in-depth hook-release mortality studies on marine fish, (2) improve outreach efforts to make the results of such research more available to the angling community and fishery managers (including education/outreach partnerships among anglers, the tackle industry and government agencies, as witnessed at this meeting yesterday), and (3) better defining and understanding how catch and release actually is practiced by marine anglers while better quantifying benefits to fish and anglers.
We need to work together to make real progress in such areas. Otherwise, we will never get much beyond the present situation whereby we feel pretty certain that catch and release fishing significantly benefits marine fish and anglers, but we do not have adequate data and rates of angler participation in the practice to quantify what the actual benefits are. Nor can we definitively address what circumstances add to, or take away from, catch and release achieving its potential as an effective component of marine angling ethics. We also need this information in order to better educate anglers and fishery managers to the realistic benefits of catch and release as a fishery conservation tool, including the fact that better management is simultaneously needed for commercial fisheries, since both fisheries share the responsibility for the well being of fishery stocks. </font id=“blue”>
End Quote.
attee, wehh!!!
ramai yg salah anggap yg CnR ni 100% CnR, langsung tak buleh ambil. dema tak pahap konsep ‘size and bag limit’. dema ingat kita tak buleh ambik langsung…
= “Angler Team Mangkor” =
“Team Mangkor U4 - 2006”
“If you tell what people want to hear, they will listen.”
Pacman/…
Boleh jelaskan tentang C&R nih tak…
mengaku memang masih kurang arif ngan konsep C n R nih…