X-Rap vs Flat Rap

I was with a friend at a tackle shop earlier today, and we saw the new 6cm Flat Raps.
They looked great. Picked up a few.
My friend even contacted his favorite tackle shop to order 2 boxes of FLR-6 right away, upon discovering that it’s just been released in our market.

I told him that I still preferred the X-Raps, as I’ve had better results with the XR-6 and XR-8 instead of the FLR-8.
He said, if given the choice to choose only 1 between the 2, he’d choose the FLR.

That kind of started a discussion between the two of us, over which is a more versatile lure.

I know many of you might say that it is not really the same kind of lure, and it may not be a true apple to apple comparison, but they are pretty similar in terms of function/features, such as:

  1. Relatively shallow running depth
  2. Size-weight ratio (XR8/FLR8 are 7g, XR6/FLR6 are 4g)
  3. Offered in similar sizes
  4. Floating (although X-Raps suspend better)

If you were given a choice to choose only 1 out of the 2, which would you choose to have in your tackle box? An X-Rap or a Flat Rap?

Feel free to share your opinions and sort of ‘vote’ for whichever you feel is more effective for you.

This is between the XR-6/8 and the FLR-6/8.

Enjoy!

Oh yeah…

1 vote for X-Rap.

I feel the suspending feature of the X-Rap is most useful.
The slightly deeper running depth on the X-Rap also makes it a more versatile lure that can be played at a variety of depths depending on retrieve technique.
Also, I just feel the X-Rap is a more natural-looking and real-looking bait.
I also believe the X-Rap casts slightly better.

X-Rap 6/8 - 1
Flat Rap 6/8 - 0

xrap for me.

X-Rap 6/8 - 2
Flat Rap 6/8 - 0

vote goes to flat rap

one of the better new product from Rapala, the rest arent close

balsa is my fav material for lures for that superb action hardly found in other material… and they cost less than xrap tooo!!!

distance wise, flatrap cast further for me due to the right aerodynamics. if not they’re the same

price wise, cheaper than xrap and using balsa is a double plus.

action i like both but flatrap gain the upper hand for my type of fishing. Swims true and won’t sidetrack

lil resistance when swimming thus could use light tackle and dont feel the load, not tired throwing them all day

dept, the only downside i could find with flatrap, not as deep as i’d like to but i’m happy with the depth it is too for some application it’s magical, a deeper diving ones probably needs a longer bib thus having more parts and might dampten the flight velocity, reducing distance

but that doesnt mean i do not like xrap, just tat i prefer flatrap, since i’d only given one choice. Both would be in my box when the time comes.

Novice angler here, any constructive advices greatly appreciated. Thank you

this is definitely an intersting discussion. I will love to see the Flat Rap dives a bit deeper too [:D]

My love is always Balsa lures too [:D]

balsa is my fav lures too.
Hope for the deep minnow balsa soon

yocox.com
012-6986303
014-5488387

hehehehhehe…loves flat rap..
flat rap deep???[:p][:p] hehehhehehhehe…

Flat rap definitely

-newbie here, help needed-

Flat rap rocks!!!

[IMG]http://i676.photobucket.com/albums/vv129/laxarioz/sign-1.jpg[/IMG]

Flap Rap..easy casting lure..love it..one of MJ favourite targeted lure too..

-newbie here, help needed-

xrap: 2
flatrap: 5

seems like flat rap is leading… keep on nominating guys!

I only have 13 years of fishing experience, so must beri tunjuk ajar!

Flatrap nice action ****ty quality, the bib keeps breaking, what a pity Rapala is such a big disappointment these days, price go up quality go downs, so sad

No pain no gain, dont try dont know… muahahahahaha

it’s not easy to find a rapala with good performance these days, there must be some down side to almost every rapala out there minus the exceptionally good ones, either cannot cast well, or cast well action not nice, action nice no distance, cast well distance good but price is sick, etc!

But when it did something great like in this case, it’s disappointing in it’s quality department…

And all the exceptionally good ones, mostly those of yesteryears… are blessed with no-longer-in production kinda rubbish. While the rest i’d like to attribute their quality and performance to their older staff professionalism.

More than half of the new Rapala that i bought need tuning to get a more perfect running action, and have quite a number are actually hopeless in their tuning. Compare to some cheap lures at sub RM20 tat surprise me with their tuning. No wonder the Americans are very frustrated with Rapala as well, as can be seen by their feedback that i’ve read thus far isnt promising at all.

And true to tat, i’ve bought quite a number of americans rapala thru online as well to test. And seriously, those are really crap, not sure bad batch or what, so far the few i’ve tested throughout are not as good as ours(but tat doesnt mean ours are any much better). I’d like to say more than 80% need tuning and almost half are hopeless when it first swim out of the box.

I’m really not into flaming Rapala and it’s not my profession nor do i profess in such activity. But i do feel it’s my every right to express my view and let ppl know my intention. First and foremost, i really love Rapala, it’s almost like our M’sian household name for hard lures. But situation is bout to change by the way things are going about with Rapala these days, i really don’t know what’s wrong.

They increase price, ok, but why the quality are falling behind as in the materials too? If they do not increase price but with the bad quality then it’s still acceptable, or if they increase price with quality increase then it’s amendable in my opinion. But why this? I really hope this would change and Rapala would remain to be the best and forerunner in hard lures just like what they had use to been in the past.

If i said something wrong, then it’s ok i’m sorry. But the fact is there for everyone to see. I hope i did tell out the truth and give constructive advice even if it’ll be ignored like how it had been done for over too long now, but at least i knew i’ve done my best, and others will at least get a better idea of the situation if nothing have been done.

What if i try to be denial about it, and what if i told someone my favourite lure would be Rapala, but the outcome is hardly satisfactory. I do not mind if i been seen as crazy to be a user of Rapala, but Rapala fame and credibility would definitely suffer. What if a beginner use it and swear it’s a pcs of crap, they will definitely never go for it anymore, so do others that come after them, bare in mind Rapala is no longer the only lure brand that’s available in Malaysia like ‘yesteryear’

I only have 13 years of fishing experience, so must beri tunjuk ajar!

quote:
Originally posted by Tan Jiin Sheng
it's not easy to find a rapala with good performance these days, there must be some down side to almost every rapala out there minus the exceptionally good ones, either cannot cast well, or cast well action not nice, action nice no distance, cast well distance good but price is sick, etc!

But when it did something great like in this case, it’s disappointing in it’s quality department…

And all the exceptionally good ones, mostly those of yesteryears… are blessed with no-longer-in production kinda rubbish. While the rest i’d like to attribute their quality and performance to their older staff professionalism.

More than half of the new Rapala that i bought need tuning to get a more perfect running action, and have quite a number are actually hopeless in their tuning. Compare to some cheap lures at sub RM20 tat surprise me with their tuning. No wonder the Americans are very frustrated with Rapala as well</font id=“red”></font id=“size2”>, as can be seen by their feedback that i’ve read thus far isnt promising at all.

And true to tat, i’ve bought quite a number of americans rapala thru online as well to test. And seriously, those are really crap, not sure bad batch or what, so far the few i’ve tested throughout are not as good as ours(but tat doesnt mean ours are any much better). I’d like to say more than 80% need tuning and almost half are hopeless when it first swim out of the box.

I’m really not into flaming Rapala and it’s not my profession nor do i profess in such activity. But i do feel it’s my every right to express my view and let ppl know my intention. First and foremost, i really love Rapala, it’s almost like our M’sian household name for hard lures. But situation is bout to change by the way things are going about with Rapala these days, i really don’t know what’s wrong.

They increase price, ok, but why the quality are falling behind as in the materials too? If they do not increase price but with the bad quality then it’s still acceptable, or if they increase price with quality increase then it’s amendable in my opinion. But why this? I really hope this would change and Rapala would remain to be the best and forerunner in hard lures just like what they had use to been in the past.

If i said something wrong, then it’s ok i’m sorry. But the fact is there for everyone to see. I hope i did tell out the truth and give constructive advice even if it’ll be ignored like how it had been done for over too long now, but at least i knew i’ve done my best, and others will at least get a better idea of the situation if nothing have been done.

What if i try to be denial about it, and what if i told someone my favourite lure would be Rapala, but the outcome is hardly satisfactory. I do not mind if i been seen as crazy to be a user of Rapala, but Rapala fame and credibility would definitely suffer. What if a beginner use it and swear it’s a pcs of crap, they will definitely never go for it anymore, so do others that come after them, bare in mind Rapala is no longer the only lure brand that’s available in Malaysia like ‘yesteryear’

I only have 13 years of fishing experience, so must beri tunjuk ajar!


Americans dun need to be so dependent on Rapala, when they have better products in brands like Bagley, Norman, Mann’s, Bomber, etc. Lures that Malaysians know too little about.

[quote]Originally posted by Tan Jiin Sheng

it’s not easy to find a rapala with good performance these days, there must be some down side to almost every rapala out there minus the exceptionally good ones, either cannot cast well, or cast well action not nice, action nice no distance, cast well distance good but price is sick, etc!</font id=“red”> </font id=“size1”>

Nice expressions TJS…same here…[:(]

I agree with bro Tan. Use to remember last time when we go in to tackle shop, when we ask for lure we say Rapala, Rapala represent the lure that we use. We don’t mention Yuzuri or Daiwa etc etc, we say Rapala. The RFR deep diver that was release last year, their finishing was poorly done. Rapala has apologizes umpteen times but still the problem still persist. I believe many lure user in Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore would still want to see Rapala retain its former glory as one of the GO TO lures. At the mean time we are this having faith in Rapala, hope there will not be a day we have to turn to cheap china made lures such as Baxxx or Strike xxx. Rapala will always have sentimental value in all of us. My 1st toman was on a husky jerk (RFR still land me the most toman), 1st haruan on lure was on a CDSR, 1st sebbie also on CDSR.
We know Rapala has diversify into many section of the sport fishing industry, but please remember your roots. IT IS the balsa lure that got you where you are today.
My apologies to anyone that has been offended by my 2 cents worth of opinion.

I do not associate with MEAT HUNTER.